Buy products related to nikon telephoto len products and see what customers say about nikon telephoto len products on Amazon.com ✓ FREE DELIVERY. Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLR Cameras. I have a 50mm prime lens that offers great shots, but this 35mm lens offers AWESOME shots! Nikon AF-S FX NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8G Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLR Cameras.
This is great lens for the money. Actually, an incredible deal.
It is worth the price just for the macro mode. The pictures I have been taking of flowers are excellent. Comparing this lens to it's competition - the Nikon 70-300 & Sigma 70-300: The 3 lenses are comparable in length (4.6'), diameter (3'), & weight (1#).
They each have 9 bladed apertures. They are all about the same price. None have VR - you have to spend 400 more bucks to get this for a Nikon. The Sigma and Tamron are superior to the Nikon, because - they have LD glass, - they are Digital Integrated, - they have focus motors, - they have Macro modes (1:2), The Tamron is superior to the Sigma, because - it is a newer design (introduced. I wanted this for a trip that is coming up so I don't have to change lenses constantly.
I do like to limit myself to fixed focal length lenses but when you want an all in one as your go to lens this is the best one to get. This is almost the exact same size and weight of the 18-140 that is also an awesome lens but I personally wanted something with a longer focal length and was an all in one solution.
Nice and balanced, fast accurate focus, great zoom and all around if this is the only lens you have I can't see how you will be disappointed. This is a nice addition to my ever growing assortment of lenses. I often contemplate going with something off brand but always come back to Nikon lens for my D7100.
I've had the opportunity to use this lens for what it was intended, and I'm even happier than I was before. I've used the Sigma 150-500 and the Nikon 80-400 before and I think this is the lens I'll be using from now on. While it doesn't have the wider range of my 80-400 it is definitely going to be my choice for birding.
I love that this lens is 5.6 through all it's zoom range and the focus is extremely sharp and quick for my needs. I rated this lens 5 starts when I first used it and I only wish I could give it more after spending a full day shooting with it. It's amazing to be able to get an excellent quality Nikon super tele for my Nikon camera.
This lens is well built and I definitely recommend it over the Sigma as the quality seems. Other than my 50mm 1.8D (the sharpest lens Nikon makes, bar none), this is the ONLY lens I carry.
Although it's big and heavy, it's sharp, fast and pairs PERFECTLY with the D700. I've shot this lens on almost every continent, in conditions that would simply crush other lenses, and it's held up amazing. The thing is bulletproof. If you have the money, buy it. If you need clarity, sharpness, great color and superior performance, buy it. If/when I destroy my current copy, I'll be replacing it immediately with the exact same. Nikon swung for the fences on this one, and knocked the ball right out of the park.
The Opteka 650-2600mm (really a 650-1300mm with 2x teleconverter) is terrific. I have a Sigma 150-500mm with stabilization, but this lens will get sharper shots with good light, works well for the moon.
![Nikon Nikon](/uploads/1/2/4/7/124724968/707727101.jpg)
There is some rainbow effect along straight lines. Buy all thing considered you would spend thousands of dollars for a auto focus, VR lens. I is not hard to set you camera on manual and get good photos. I would recommend this lens.
The moon, owl, and pier shot are unedited. The closest lens is $1000, and a Nikon is 10 Grand.
So glad I purchased this lens for my Nikon D5100. Incredible lens for the money. So lightweight and easy to use. The AF works quickly and quietly for my use - perhaps a professional might think it a little slow.it is not.pictures are great.what i like the most is the weight (or lack of).great for travel when you don't want to carry around heavy metal lenses. It is plastic as is the mount, but you only have to be relatively careful. With this lens I would pick up by the camera and not the lens alone, since the mount is plastic.
I now only carry this and a Nikon 50mm in a smaller bag. All the lens you need. Great zoom lens. I've been trying to build up my arsenal of photography stuff with actual quality components recently and was hoping to find a good all around lens for my A65. In the past I've tried use the kit 18-55 and another 55-200 or 70-300 but so often it was either inconvenient or impossible to swap lenses. So I finally broke down and got a lens that should keep me going for most any subject.
Now specifically regarding the Sony lens, it does NOT have any type of stabilizer. Since the Sony uses sensor shift, I guess Tamron figured we didn't need another stabilizer. While this is fine, I do wish they could have dropped the price a bit to reflect the differences but oh well.
As for the lens in general, if you're going from say the 18-55 to this, it's going to seem monstrous. There is no question that at any focal length a prime lens will give sharper pictures, especially when the light is poor, and when shooting wildlife the light is never in your control. Trouble with the prime lens is that the subject may just be too close or too far for the lens on the camera; or that just after shooting a bird you notice that the landscape offers a great shot too. So do you change lenses? Not a good idea on safari, where dust is a constant companion. Thus I am a proponent of zoom lenses for wildlife photography because of their versatility.
A number of makers offer 18-200 lenses which offer good image quality at all focal lengths, and I have used one for years. (see my review of the Tamron 18-200). The downside is that there are times when you.
Review of the Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G AF-S versus other Nikkor 50mm AF lenses This quick review is based on my use of this lens for almost 3-weeks. It is intended for those already familiar with Nikkor's line of 50mm prime lenses but are wondering how this lens compare with the other Nikkor 50mm autofocusing lenses that I also own. I did however provide a section for beginners or novice at the last section of this review. AGAINST THE NIKKOR f/1.8D The Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G is slightly bigger than the Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D and a bit heavier but by a mere 31 grams, hardly noticeable at all. Unlike the 50mm f/1.8D, it comes with a reversible hood which does a good job in protecting and shading the lens.
Unlike the 50mm f/1.8D which uses a 52mm filter, this lens uses a 58mm filter. Unlike the 50mm f/1.8D which has.
I have a Nikon D7000 and my wife has a D5100. I have a 50mm prime lens that offers great shots, but this 35mm lens offers AWESOME shots! I love this lens.
Great color, ease of use, wider aperture. This is the only lens I have been carrying around along with a telephoto lens. You cannot go wrong for the price.
You can let the camera focus for you or just turn the lens and manually focus. I allow the camera to do it. The lens doesn't move when focusing, only the focus ring. Great shots in low light.
I shoot all Nikon on a D300s body (DX), multiple speedlights (SB-700's and an SB-900), and the full array of Nikon pro glass. This lens is the 'holy grail' due to it's mid-range focal length (about 75mm on DX), large aperture, compact size, and light weight. However, some people moving from a kit lens and used to a consumer level DSLR body (slower focusing, different expeed engines, no AF Fine Tuning), may run into some issues. Before I go further, please accept this review as a pragmatic, rather than technical review. I focus on end-user usability in the consumer to intermediate range. Other's like to focus on numbers and other technical aspects and they do a great job for nerds like me.
This lens will surely appeal to consumer level shooters considering 'moving up' in glass. These are shooters that typically spend less than $1,000 on a. I'm an all around photographer whose interest is in photographing whatever captures my eye. It could be portraits, landscapes, florals, art, and wildlife.
For the last year or so, I've been interested in getting a macro lens for my Nikon D7000. I've read many reviews on the Nikkor 40mm Micro and decided to give it a try. The price was within my budget. I ordered this lens two weeks ago and have been using it non-stop with wonderful results. I've set aside my 18-200mm, 35mm, and 50mm lens.
That's how good this 40mm lens is. I received this micro lens in time to capture the early Spring flowers.
This 40mm micro lens does a great job capturing close-ups of flowers and plants. My pictures are coming out sharp and clear. Do you hear a 'wow' from me? I have taken a close-up picture of my. First thing you notice when you open the Amazon box is the small size of the Nikon product box.
It just doesn't look like it would house a telephoto lens - especially an 18-300mm lens. Upon opening the box, it is indeed a small lens for what it is. It's weight is 550 grams compared to the hefty 828 grams of the original 18-300mm lens it replaces. 550 grams is also about the same weight of the 18-200mm lens. This newer lens is lighter, smaller and less expensive than the lens it replaces.
I replaced and sold my 18-200mm, and my 55-300mm for this one. It is true, and I was a bit mystified, that this lens does not come with a lens bag or a lens hood. But on the other hand, the Nikon lens bags do nothing to protect the lens in any way. This is the primary lens on my Nikon D5200. At 7.8x zoom, it covers almost all my focal length needs, with surprisingly few optical compromises. Build quality is solid with near premium materials. It's reasonably sharp at all focal length.
Focusing performance is superb: lightning fast, and always on target. There is essentially no focus hunting, even in low light. At longer focal lengths, you get a nice background blur. The zoom gears are a little on the stiff side, but as a result there is absolutely no zoom creep.
At 55 mm focal length, the aperture opens to f4.8, which is one-half stop brighter than the f5.6 value of Nikon's 18-55 basic kit zoom at the same focal length. What are the downsides? In the first place, a well built long zoom like this is going to be big and heavy. I'd like to write a review based on the performance of this lenses but there's a lot of well educated people reviewing this so read there's I won't waste my time.
Although I couldn't find a lot of people reviewing on refurbished lenses. I was very reluctant to buy refurbished but I'm glad I did.
I've been using this lenses almost two years now and its held up great. It came with everything the new lenses comes with except the box but really who cares about the box when u compare the price with new. If your reluctant like I was save your money and buy the refurbished lenses.
Under the technical details this is listed as a zoom lens. It is a prime lens and does not zoom. You must change your position to frame your photo. This lens will not autofocus with many DX cameras. Specifically the D40, D40x, D60, D3000, d3100, D3200, D3300, D5000, D5100, D5200, D5300. Autofocus is a critical function for these are cameras aimed at novice/newer to digital photographers. It will mount on these cameras, it will function in all respects but the autofocus.
It WILL fully function with the D90, D7000, D7100, more expensive cameras aimed at enthusiasts. They contain a focusing mechanism in the camera body that works with the AF designated lenses. That being said, this is a spectacular lens as others have reported. A prime lens can rock your world in terms of clarity and photo quality. When being used on a DX camera it does. I've had the opportunity to use this lens for what it was intended, and I'm even happier than I was before. I've used the Sigma 150-500 and the Nikon 80-400 before and I think this is the lens I'll be using from now on.
While it doesn't have the wider range of my 80-400 it is definitely going to be my choice for birding. I love that this lens is 5.6 through all it's zoom range and the focus is extremely sharp and quick for my needs. I rated this lens 5 starts when I first used it and I only wish I could give it more after spending a full day shooting with it. It's amazing to be able to get an excellent quality Nikon super tele for my Nikon camera.
This lens is well built and I definitely recommend it over the Sigma as the quality seems much. The f/3.0 takes stunning photos in low light situations like sunrise/sunset, foothills inside closed valley. There is a decent range of angle to make the photo look straight through this fisheye to take portraits with wide scenery. It takes fair amount of learning curve on how to fully utilize this lens, but believe me once you figure it out you won't be disappointed at all. The photos can be turned into 180 degree pan views by flattening in any editing software, I mainly use GIMP on linux. The 8mm helps to get sharp images with minimal distortion.
Glad that I bought this lens before my roadtrip. Check out the unedited sample images. I have paired this with the 70-200mm VR II on a D700 and am so far very impressed with the performance. There is some loss of sharpness, but it retains detail far more than I was expecting, and it is much, much, much better than the TC-20E II. Given that the III is also smaller and lighter makes it well worth the extra money in my book.
AF with this combination is still fast and sure, about on par with the 70-300mm VR if not a bit snappier and with less hunting, and is fast enough for sports in daylight. I was also surprised by how well the bokeh holds up; there are some weird effects due the TC, but the bokeh (at least on the 70-200mm VR II) still maintains a creamy quality and the artifacts are not as distracting as they are with the previous generation TC's. I first bought this 55-200mm through an outside vendor and it's amazing how these electronics megastores will mark up their items to a ridiculous price. This lens is NOT worth over $200 and if you paid that much, I advise you return it and save $$$$ by ordering through amazon.com which was what I did. I returned this nice lens to that store but bought it again through amazon.com and saved $100! Anyways, this lens goes great with my 18-55mm lens that came with my Nikon D50.
The 3.6x zoom is not bad at all and if you can live with the slow autofocus, it's actually pretty good bang for your buck. You start losing a little depth when you near 200mm. The images are still sharp (depth starts to suffer the more you zoom in). This lens is actually quite good in regards to image.